• Users Online: 150
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home Current issue Archives Ahead of print Search Subscribe Instructions Submit article About us Editorial board Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 40  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 162-169

Psychiatric aspects of children who witness domestic violence


1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
2 Department of Psychiatry, Al-Dawly General Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt

Date of Submission15-Sep-2019
Date of Acceptance23-Sep-2019
Date of Web Publication19-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
MSC Dalia Asfour
Department of Psychiatry, Al-Dawly General Hospital, 35516
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_31_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Background The presence of domestic violence witnessed by children leads to development of different mental disorders of childhood.
Objectives This study was aimed to assess the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children who witness domestic violence.
Patients and methods A community-based case–control study was designed to assess the prevalence of psychiatric disorder in children who witness domestic violence of both sexes aged 6–18 years old with different socioeconomic classes. Tools of measurement used in the current study were Hurt, Insulted, Threatened with Harm and Screamed tool; socioeconomic scale by El-Gilany; symptoms check list (SCL-90); and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Childhood Diagnoses for child’s interview.
Results The most common disorders among children witness domestic violence is conduct disorder (15%), major depressive disorder (10%), and attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (8.3%). Children who are not affected among studied families (cases) represented 33.3%. There was a statistically significant difference among cases that witness domestic violence and controls who did not witness it regarding additional signs, loss of appetite, insomniac problems, death ideas, aggressive symptom, and reactive sensitivity symptoms reported as well as global stress indices measured by SCL-90. The most common reason for domestic violence was the financial reasons. Fathers are more responsible for most of the violence incidents.
Conclusions Ignoring of suffering and the long duration spent with domestic violent atmosphere without seeking help increase the risk for psychiatric disorder in those children. So legal empowerment and aid projects are essential in raising awareness to influence cultural change and put an end to domestic violence.

Keywords: children, domestic violence, psychiatric disorders


How to cite this article:
Gomma Z, Saleh ES, Rizk Y, Asfour D. Psychiatric aspects of children who witness domestic violence. Egypt J Psychiatr 2019;40:162-9

How to cite this URL:
Gomma Z, Saleh ES, Rizk Y, Asfour D. Psychiatric aspects of children who witness domestic violence. Egypt J Psychiatr [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 13];40:162-9. Available from: http://new.ejpsy.eg.net/text.asp?2019/40/3/162/271305




  Introduction Top


Millions of children all over the world come from aggressive and abusive homes; they witness and are exposed to all types of physical and mental abuses that no child has to deal with (UNODC, 2010). Children raised in homes with violent behaviors may be argued to believe that aggressive behavior is a normal human behavior, so it is crucial to tackle such belief when it presents among abused children (UN Women, 2012). During the mid-1990s, the adverse childhood experiences study suggested that abused children who were raised while exposed to domestic violence and forms of aggressive behaviors had an increased risk of mental and physical health problems (Lazenbatt et al., 2009). Exposure to chronic stress at young age disrupts the homeostasis of stress biology systems, including inflammatory process and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis hormones, which in turn disrupts normal growth of brain structures, which results in noticeable deficits in stress-exposed individuals, including cognitive functions such as tested learning, memory, and attention capacities (Danese and Mc Ewen, 2012).

In the E-risk longitudinal study of a nationally representative UK birth cohort of 2232 children, general neuropsychological deficit of 4–8 IQ points is present in victimized children with abusive homes (Wilson et al., 2001). Exposure for long periods is important. Another study reported on 1777 children registered with Child Protective Services that children who come from abusive homes chronically across multiple years experience decreased IQs than children who were just situationally maltreated (Jaffee and Maikovich, 2011). Moreover, victimized children have reported to be fearful and inhibited and obviously more depressed than other children in safe home situation (Adams, 2006). Apart from internalizing disorders, victimized children also show more externalized behavioral problems such as aggressive and antisocial behaviors (Duncan et al., 2005).

Moreover, children raised in abusive homes can be affected by an increased number of physical symptoms besides other behavioral, psychological, and emotional state of despair. Children may express general pain and aches, such as headaches and stomach aches. They also are exposed to irritable and irregular bowel habits and cold sores, and they may complain of bedwetting. Such symptoms have been linked to depressive disorders in children, which is considered a usual psychological result of domestic abuse. Besides the general complaints of not feeling well, children who witness domestic violence may also appear nervous, and they may also be exposed to symptoms of fatigue and unrelieved exhaustion. Moreover, exposed children may fall asleep in school owing to less sleep hours they have at home, as much of the night may be wasted in witnessing violence at their homes. These children are frequently ill and experience poor personal hygiene; children raised in abusive homes tend to have increased involvement in high-risk play activities, self-abuse, and suicide (Horner, 2005).

A new established fact is that childhood violence victimization is also linked to schizophrenia, psychosis, and psychotic-like symptoms (Varese et al., 2012). Besides the course of illness, a meta-analysis shows that being victimized as a child also predicts a worse course of depression, as measured by number of recurrences. Childhood exposure to domestic abuse also significantly predicts a more severe course of major depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, alcohol-dependence disorders, and drug-dependence disorders. Regarding the response to treatment, a meta-analysis of clinical trials examined the treatment course of depressive disorders and showed that victimized as a child was linked to increased risk of nonresponding or relapse during treatment (Nanni et al., 2012).

This study is aimed to assess the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in children who witness domestic violence.


  Patients and methods Top


This is a community based case–control study.

Patients were selected by a simple randomization method. The study included children and families who represent different sociodemographic classes, aged from 6 to 18 years, in Dakhlia discrete community.

An initial pilot study was done to estimate the exact number of participant children. The pilot study estimated that the proposed number of the study is 120 children, divided into 60 children, as a case group, who have been exposed to domestic violence, and 60 children, as a control group, who have not been exposed to domestic violence.

Children younger than 6 years and adolescents older than 18 years, children with mental retardation disorders, children with autism spectrum disorders, children with and psychiatric disorder owing to general medical conditions were excluded.

Approvals and ethical considerations

Informed consent was taken from each family. The consent contained appropriate details about nature of the study, method, aim of the work, and importance of its futuristic results. All personal information was confidential, and the patients of the study were free to withdraw themselves at any point if they wanted to. The interviews were held at the clinic. The interviewees were contacted to give dates for the interview. The interviewees were reached by the help of lawyers in the family court and by colleagues in the primary health facilities and from Mansoura Sport and Social Club.

Tools of the study

  1. Hurt, Insulted, Threatened with harm and Screamed (Sherinet al., 1998): it is a domestic violence screening tool. It consists of a clinical questionnaire of 10 questions answered by the parents. This questionnaire was answered by the mothers of the case group to identify the severity of exposure of child to violence incidents within the family. Each item is scored from 1 to 5 for four questions, and a score greater than 10 is positive for domestic abuse within the family. This screen test was performed on mothers to identify the case group who scored positive on the test and the control group who scored negative on the test.
  2. Socioeconomic scale by Gilanyet al. (2012):
    • This scale was conducted on our sample to classify our sample into different socioeconomic classes, to make sure that we took a heterogeneous sample that represents all classes of Dakhlia discrete community and to identify whether social, economic, and educational status can affect the outcome for the children who are exposed to domestic violence incidents.
  3. Symptoms check list (SCL-90) (El-Behairy, 1984):
    • It is a self-report psychometric instrument that consists of 90 items. It consists of nine scores representing symptom dimensions and three scores representing global stress indices. High number of studies proved the reliability and the validity of this instrument. It is used to check the variety dimension of symptoms on both case and control groups. Psychological distress is also measured by the global indices on children of both case and control groups.
  4. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Childhood Diagnoses (SCID) for Kids (Matzneret al., 1997):


To reach Diagnostic and statistical manual for mental disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) diagnosis if present, SCID for Kids is used as a diagnostic tool, which is a standard instrument compatible with DSM-IV criteria for attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD), other disruptive behavior disorders, and substance abuse disorder among children and adolescent.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical package, version 16 (Version 16, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percent. χ2 was used to test significance between groups. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results Top


[Table 1] and [Table 2] show that the most common reason for domestic violence was financial reasons, then addiction, then the third cause was neglect of household or children, and then fourth was asking for divorce or refusal to have sex with partner, extramarital affairs, and explosive episodes. Fathers are more responsible for most of the violence incidents ([Table 3]).
Table 1 Prevalence of aggressive behavior in both parents

Click here to view
Table 2 Causes of domestic violence incident in the case groupa

Click here to view
Table 3 Sociodemographic data of psychiatric disorders among cases who witnessed domestic violencea

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows that the prevalence of psychiatric disorder in the case group of children was 66.7% compared with 35% in the control group of children, which was statistically significant (P=0.01). The most common disorders among children witnessing domestic violence is conduct disorder (15%), major depressive disorder (10%), and ADHD (8.3%). Children who are not affected among studied families (cases) represented 33.3%. There were no children affected with tic disorder, phobic disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder according to SCID for Kids. Mental retardation and autism diagnoses were excluded. Children in the case group had higher scores at the additional symptom domain than children at the control group. There is a statistically significant difference among the cases and controls.
Table 4 Prevalence and different diagnoses of psychiatric disorders among cases who witnessed domestic violence and control group

Click here to view


[Table 5] shows that there is a statistically significant difference in the severity and type of domestic violence among cases that witnessed domestic violence and diagnosed with psychiatric disorders in comparison with cases not complaining of any psychiatric diagnoses.
Table 5 Comparing variant of domestic violence types and severity in relation to psychiatric diagnosis among cases that witnessed domestic violence

Click here to view


[Table 6] shows that good relation of the child with his father decreases the appearance of psychiatric disorders among the case group. The age of the children who witness violence makes significant difference among cases who are affected and who are not affected with illness.
Table 6 Relation with both parents and its relation to psychiatric diagnosis in the case group

Click here to view


[Table 7] shows that there is a statistical significant difference regarding aggressive symptom domain and reactive sensitivity symptom domain measured by SCL-90. Children in the case group had higher scores at the aggressive symptom domain and reactive sensitivity domain than children in the control group. Children in the case group had higher scores than children at the control group regarding global stress indices (Global Severity Index, Positive Symptom Distress Index, and Positive Symptom Total) measured by SCL-90.
Table 7 Prevalence of aggression and reactive sensitivity and stress indices among cases who witness domestic violence and controls who do not witness domestic violence

Click here to view


[Table 8] explains that there is a highly statistical significant difference among cases and controls regarding school refusal problem and certain social problems, such as multiple fights with classmates and multiple attendances for the parents to the school for their children problems, in comparison with remaining part of the sample.
Table 8 Academic problem and Social problem in the studied sample

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


This current study is a trial to explore the phenomena of domestic violence in Egypt and its relation to presence of psychiatric illnesses among children exposed to such struggling situations. The recent study found that children in the case group have statistically significant higher incidents of psychiatric disorder than the control group, using KID SCID DSM-IV tool for diagnosis of psychiatric disorder. Results found that 40 children of the 60 children in the case group have the diagnostic criteria of a psychiatric disorder, and the numbers were as follows: six (10%) children have met the diagnostic criteria of major depression disorder, one (1.7%) child has dysthymia, three (5%) children have the diagnosis of mood disorder bipolar mania, four (6.7%) children have panic disorder, four (6.7%) children have obsessive-compulsive disorder, one (1.7%) child has substance abuse problem, five (8.3%) children have ADHD, nine (15%) children met the diagnosis of conduct disorder, two (3.3%) children have oppositional defiant disorder, and five (8.3%) of children met the diagnosis of psychotic disorders. For the control group, only 21 children of the control group have met criteria of psychiatric disorder, where ADHD was the commonest psychiatrist disorder in the control group, whereas 39 children were not diagnosed with any psychiatric disorder.

The study results are consistent with other international studies that examine children who are being victimized by domestic violence, which demonstrate that these children often meet the diagnostic criteria of the DSM-IV, for depression, ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder, conduct disorder, anxiety disorders, eating disorders, sleep disorders, communication disorders, separation anxiety disorder, and reactive attachment disorder. Each of these diagnoses is linked to diminished ability of the victimized child’s complex self-regulatory and relational impairments and diminished capability of problem-solving skills and cognitive dysfunction that affect the appraisal of different future life incidents (Cook et al., 2005).

Victimized children not only have childhood psychiatric disorders but are more prone to lifelong psychiatric disorders, and these problems may extend from childhood through adolescence and into adulthood. The diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder is often present with adults who had a history of domestic violence; depression, addiction, anxiety disorders, self-abuse, and suicide are also present at higher rates in the adult life of children who have a history of domestic violence (Horner, 2005).

In the current study, the case group of children not only had higher prevalence of the complete picture of psychiatric disorders when compared with the control group, which was assessed by Kids SCID, but also the case group ranked much higher scores on the individual symptoms assessed by SCL-90 for symptom severity. The case group had much higher symptoms of severity on anxiety symptoms, aggressive symptoms, and delusional symptoms. This could predict more complicated course and worse prognosis of the psychiatric disorders. The results of the current study are consistent with the international different studies conducted on children raised in abusive homes who can be affected by an increased number of physical symptoms besides other behaviors, psychological, and emotional state of despair. Children may express general pain and aches, such as headaches and stomach aches. They also are exposed to irritable and irregular bowel habits and cold sores, and they may complain of bedwetting. Such symptoms have been linked to depressive disorders in children, which is considered a usual psychological result of domestic abuse. Besides the general complaints of not feeling well, children who witness domestic violence may also appear nervous, and the children may also be exposed to symptoms of fatigue and unrelieved exhaustion. Moreover, exposed children may fall asleep in school owing to less sleep hours they have at home, as much of the night may be wasted in witnessing violence at their homes (Horner, 2005). Regarding the frequency and severity of the violence witnessed by children, they are more likely to develop problems related to witnessing domestic violence if the violence is frequent, and severity of incidents of violence also affects the psychological response of the child (Zuckerman et al., 1995).

Other problems affecting children exposed to domestic violence are social problems. The current study results shows that there is a highly statistical significant difference among cases that witness domestic violence and controls who did not witness it regarding social abilities; children in the case group are less able to make friends, do not engage in the school or sports activity, and tend to have multiple fights with classmates. These results are compatible with the studies which show that children living in violent homes lose the ability to feel empathy for others, are unable to make friends, and are usually withdrawn. On the contrary, many children who witness domestic violence are exposed to role reversal between the child and the parent (usually the mother), as the responsibilities of the victim who is emotionally and psychologically dysfunctional are transferred to the child (UN Women, 2012). Low social abilities of children exposed to domestic violence are explained also by the limited ability of mastering complex self-regulatory functions and relational impairments and less ability of problem-solving skills (Cook et al., 2005).When comparing academic performance between the case and the control group of children, the results reveal that the prevalence of low academic performance in the case group of children was 23% compared with 16% in the control group of children, the prevalence of recurrent school absence in the case group was 20% and only 10% in the control group, the prevalence of school refusal among case group was 25% in comparison with 5% in the control group, and the prevalence of children who do not have academic problem in the case group was 16.7% in comparison with 58.3% in the control group. This is consistent with international studies that have compared maltreated children versus nonmaltreated children and detected deficits in tests of memory, executive functions, attention, and concentration, making these children more prone to less academic performance and having less desire to attended school or study on a regular basis (Jaffee and Maikovich, 2011).

As important as examining the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in victimized children, it is crucial to look for the factors that can affect the outcome of the children victimized by domestic abuse (Maxwell and Maxwell, 2003). Regarding the age as a risk factor for developing psychiatric disorders in victimized children, the youngest age groups appear to exhibit more problems than those in other age groups (Hornor, 2005). Preschool children who face domestic violence incidents commonly show withdrawn attitude and anxiety and fearfulness, and school-age children in the same situations also show change in behaviors, which affects their academic achievements (Hornor, 2005). In the current study results, the age factor had a statistically significant difference, as in the case group, the affected children with psychiatric disorder were 40 children, and the mean age for the affected children was 12 years, whereas the number of the nonaffected children was 21, and the mean age group of them was 9 years. This difference in our study results compared with the results of other international studies is probably owing to the sample collected, which was from age 6 to 18, and at the clinical interview with the children in the case group, it was noticed that the oldest children themselves were more involved in family dispute more than the younger children.

When assessing sex difference a as risk factor in the appearance of psychiatric symptoms in victimized children who attend violence at their homes, both sexes are negatively affected, but the affection nature is different between boys and girls (Becker and Mc Closkey, 2002). Results from several studies suggest that victimization by domestic violence as a child, boys experience externalized behavior problems such as aggressiveness and disobedience, whereas girls are more likely to experience internalized symptoms such as anxiety and depression. However, girls from violent homes are at risk of externalized problems throughout adolescence (Becker and Mc Closkey 2002). This finding is congruent with a study which found that girls of age group 12–18 years of abused mothers showed behavior problems such as aggression and delinquency, whereas adolescent males experience sadness (McFarlane et al., 2003). In the current study results, we found among the examined case group that there was a difference in children affected by psychiatric disorders regarding their sex; among the 40 children who were affected in the case group, it was noticeable that female children are significantly more affected, as 24 of the affected children were female in comparison with only 16 boys.

In current study, from clinical interview of the children in the case group, we tried to investigate why some children witnessing the same circumstances of violence are developing psychiatric disorder whereas other children do not. We found that important moderating factors were the child characteristics itself, coping ability, self-esteem, temperament, academic achievement, and physiological reactivity, which are considered factors that help in protection of the child from developing psychiatric disorders. This is consistent with other research studies that found children who are able to calm themselves with self-talk (cognitively self-soothe) during their parents’ conflict have a lower risk of experiencing high levels of stress (Maxwell and Maxwell, 2003). Another moderating factor in the current study, in the appearance of domestic violence in the case group of children is the relation with their parents; in the current study, there is a statistically significant difference among cases that are affected with psychiatric disorders and who are not affected regarding relation with the parents. Good relation of the child with his/her parents decreases the appearance of psychiatric disorders among the case group.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the help of Professor Abdel-Hady El-Gilany of Public Health, Mansoura University; Dr Ibrahem Hamdey Rashed, Psychiatry Lecturer, Mansoura University; and Resident Khaled Mamdouh, Helwan Mental Hospital, for their great help in statistical work. The authors also acknowledge all participants for sharing their information and coming to the appointments and their patience with us.

Zeinab Gomma chose the topic, supervised the data collection, and revised all steps of thesis writing. El Sayed Saleh designed the working plan, tools, revised all steps of paper writing, and shared in the paper manuscript writing. Yomna Rizk contributed to the data collection and implanted in the field work regarding psychiatric interview with patients. Dalia Asfour collected data, thesis writing, shared in the paper writing, and contributed to the paper submission in the journal.[20]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Adams C (2006). The consequence of witnessing family violence on children and implications for family counselors. Fam J 14:334–341.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Becker K, Mc Closkey L (2002). Attention and conduct problems in children exposed to family violence. Am J Orthopsychiatry 72:83–91.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cook A, Joseph S, Julian F, Cheryl L, Margaret B, Marylene C et al. (2005). Complex trauma in children and adolescents. Psychiatr Ann 35:390–398.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Danese A, Mc Ewen BS (2012). Adverse childhood experiences, allostasis, allostatic load, and age-related disease. Physiol Behav 106:29–39.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Duncan A, Thomas J, Miller C (2005). Significance of family risk factors in development of childhood animal cruelty in adolescent boys with conduct problems. J Fam Viol 20:235–239.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
El-Behairy A (1984). A symptoms checklist-90 (SCL-90R) Arabic form. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Nahda Al-Messria Library.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gilany A., El-Wehady A, El-Wasify M (2012). Updating and validation of the socioeconomic status scale for health research in Egypt. East Mediterr Health J 18:962–968.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Hornor G (2005). Domestic violence and children. J Pediatr Health Care 19:206–212.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Jaffee SR, Maikovich AK (2011). Effects of chronic maltreatment and maltreatment timing on children’s behavior and cognitive abilities. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 52:184–194.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lazenbatt Anne, Thompson Cree, Margaret EM (2009). Recognizing the co occurance of domestic violence and child abuse: a comparison of community and hospital based midwives. Health & Social Care Community 17:358–370.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Matzner F, Silva R, Silvan M, Chowdhury M, Nastasi L (1997). Preliminary test-retest reliability of the Kid-SCID. Scientific Proceedings, American Association Meeting.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
McFarlane J, Groff J, O’Brien A, Watson K (2003). Behaviors of children who are exposed and not exposed to intimate partner violence: an analysis of 330 black, white and hispanic children. Pediatr J 112:e202–e207.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Maxwell C, Maxwell S (2003). Experiencing and witnessing familial aggression and their relationship to physical aggressive behaviors among Filipino adolescents. J Interpers Viol 18:1432–1451.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Nanni V, Uher R, Danese A (2012). Childhood maltreatment predicts unfavorable course of illness and treatment outcome in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 169:141–151.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sherin K., Sinacore J, Zitter R (1998). Short domestic violence screening tool for use in a family practice setting. Fam Med 7:118–124.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
UN Women (2012). Supplement to the handbook for legislation on violence against women: harmful practices against women: harmful practices against women, 1st edition.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
UNODC (2010) Introduction: justice system responses and victim protection, preventive approaches, and responding to violence against women: the role of the police procedural law in Criminal Justice Handbook Series of United Nation Office on Drugs and Crime 19:37–86.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Varese F, Smeets F, Drukker M, Lieverse R, Lataster T, Viechtbauer W et al. (2012). Childhood adversities increase the risk of psychosis: a meta-analysis of patient control, prospective and cross sectional cohort studies. Schizophr Bull 38:661–671.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wilson KR., Hansen DJ, Li M (2001). The traumatic stress response in child maltreatment and resultant neuropsychological effects. Aggression Violent Behav 16:87–97.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zuckerman B, Augustyn M, Groves B, Parker S (1995). Silent victims revised: the special case of domestic violence. Pediatr J 96:511–513.  Back to cited text no. 20
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Patients and methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed86    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]