• Users Online: 449
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home Current issue Archives Ahead of print Search Subscribe Instructions Submit article About us Editorial board Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 43  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 7-13

Atypical antipsychotics in major depressive disorder


1 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Beni Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt
2 Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt

Date of Submission15-Jul-2021
Date of Decision20-Jul-2021
Date of Acceptance23-Aug-2021
Date of Web Publication26-Feb-2022

Correspondence Address:
MD Mohamed R Soltan
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Postal Code: 63514
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_26_21

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


The antipsychotics are used among pharmacological treatment of depression. Atypical antipsychotics have been used as monotherapy or adjunctively with antidepressants to treat depressive disorders with or without psychotic symptoms. The antidepressant effect of atypical antipsychotics involves regulation of monoamine, glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid, cortisol, and neurotrophic factors. To date, the United States Food and Drug Administration has approved aripiprazole and quetiapine slow-release tablets as adjunctive treatment for depressive disorders, and the combination of olanzapine and fluoxetine for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression. When using atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of depressed patients, clinicians need to monitor patients for the emergence of adverse effects, including hyperglycemia, weight gain, cholesterol levels, and extrapyramidal symptoms. These agents are effective for depression only at subantipsychotic doses. Receptor profiles predict that all second‐generation antipsychotics will have anxiolytic effects as subantipsychotic doses but that all will be dysphorogenic at full antipsychotic doses (i.e. produce a depression-like clinical picture). The antidepressant effect appears to be unique to some agents. Also, despite the availability of a large number of antidepressants of different classes, a significant portion of patients do not achieve remission, and treatment resistance is common. This paper reviews the antipsychotics that are effective for the treatment of depressive disorders, and the pharmacological mechanisms of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders.

Keywords: antidepressants, antipsychotics, second‐generation antipsychotics


How to cite this article:
Dessoki HH, Soltan MR. Atypical antipsychotics in major depressive disorder. Egypt J Psychiatr 2022;43:7-13

How to cite this URL:
Dessoki HH, Soltan MR. Atypical antipsychotics in major depressive disorder. Egypt J Psychiatr [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jul 7];43:7-13. Available from: http://new.ejpsy.eg.net/text.asp?2022/43/1/7/338557




  Introduction Top


Some second‐generation antipsychotics (SGAs), for example, aripiprazole, quetiapine XR, olanzapine, and brexpiprazole, had a formal United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) approval as an augmentation therapy to antidepressants in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) (Wang et al., 2016). Among them, olanzapine was approved for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD), which is defined as MDD patients who did not respond to two separate trials of two or more than two antidepressants after an appropriate duration and dose, as a combined agent with fluoxetine (Wang et al., 2016). Brexpiprazole had received FDA approval not only for schizophrenia, but also for the treatment of MDD as an adjunctive therapy to antidepressants in July 2015, which is the biggest change since 2013. In addition, FDA approved lurasidone for bipolar depression, cariprazine for the acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder (Corponi et al., 2019).

This paper reviews the antipsychotics that are effective for the treatment of certain depressive disorders, the pharmacological mechanisms of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders, and adverse reactions when using antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders.

There has been substantial progress in the search for further treatment strategies for treatment-resistant MDD (TRD): psychotropics augmentation other than antidepressants, and antidepressant switches and combinations, regardless of antidepressant classes. Among them, augmentation treatment with atypical antipsychotic agents has been recognized as an important option. Moreover, SGAs have been an area of focus after successful augmentation using risperidone to selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) was found in 1991 (Ostroff and Nelson, 1999). Thereafter, three SGAs, including olanzapine (2007), quetiapine-extended release (2007), and aripiprazole (2009) were approved by the USFDA as an augmentation therapy to antidepressants for treating MDD (Han et al., 2013).

The general information on SGA, including the current market situation for MDD, is summarized in [Table 1] and [Table 2].
Table 1 Phases of recovery with expected psychosocial symptoms and suggested treatments

Click here to view
Table 2 Assessment tools

Click here to view


Antipsychotics are effective for the treatment of certain depressive disorders

USFDA has approved the use of aripiprazole (5–10 mg/d, maximum dosage 15 mg/d) as an adjunctive medication in the treatment of depressive disorders. Combined treatment with olanzapine and fluoxetine has been approved by the USFDA for the treatment of TRD (olanzapine 5–20 mg/d, fluoxetine 20–50 mg/d) (Chen et al., 2011; Maher and Theodore, 2012). Slow-release quetiapine (150–300 mg/d) has also been approved by the USFDA as an adjunctive treatment for depressive disorders; this is the only atypical antipsychotic approved in Europe as an adjunctive treatment for depression, and in Australia, it has been approved both as an auxiliary treatment and as a primary treatment for depression.

Meta-analyses have assessed the effectiveness and side effects associated with the use of various atypical antipsychotics as adjunctive or primary treatment for depressive disorders and dysthymia (Komossa et al., 2010). Slow-release quetiapine: pooled results from seven double-blind randomized control trails (n=3414) found improved depressive symptoms when used alone or when used jointly with antidepressants, but it also had a clear sedative effect. Olanzapine: pooled results from seven double-blind randomized control trails (n=1754) found that adjunctive treatment with olanzapine improved patient adherence to treatment, but it was not associated with improved treatment effects and it was associated with weight gain and increased prolactin levels. Aripiprazole (three studies, n=1092) and risperidone (four studies, n=637): when used as adjunctive treatment to antidepressants, both medications improved the outcomes, but they were associated with weight gain and increased prolactin levels (Komossa et al., 2010). No significant differences have been found in the antidepressant effects of the different atypical antipsychotic medications assessed (Chen et al., 2011).

Some studies have also shown benefits of antipsychotic treatment during the maintenance phase of treatment for depression. A 52-week follow-up study reported that relapses were fewer among individuals with depressive disorders who received monotherapy with slow-release quetiapine (50–300 mg/d) during the maintenance phase of treatment than in those given placebos (Sagud et al., 2011). Another study found that the relapses were delayed among those who received adjunctive treatment with risperidone or amisulpride compared with those who received placebos as adjunctive treatment (Chen et al., 2011).

Pharmacological mechanisms of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders

The antidepressant effect of typical antipsychotics is presumed to be related to the inhibition of D2/D3 receptors on the dopamine (DA) pathway in the prefrontal cortex, which increases the DA level in the prefrontal cortex. The antidepressant effects of atypical antipsychotics include rapid disengagement of DA receptors, reduced activation of DA receptors, reduced activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT1A) receptors, inhibition of 5-HT2A/2C receptors, inhibition of α2 receptors, the blockage of the norepinephrine (NE) transporter, the regulation of the glutamate (GA) or the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) system, a decrease in cortisol levels, and an increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels (Wang and Si, 2013).

Dopamine

The effect of atypical antipsychotics on mood is related to the rapid release of DA from the receptor and the consequent reduced activation of DA receptors. In untreated schizophrenia, the occurrence of positive symptoms is a result of increased output of DA in the midbrain limbic system; the occurrence of cognitive impairment and negative symptoms is a result of decreased output of DA in the cerebral cortical pathways to the dorsal prefrontal cortex; and the occurrence of mood and negative symptoms is a result of decreased output of DA in the cerebral cortical pathways to the ventral prefrontal cortex. In theory, the D2 receptors need to be blocked in order to reduce the DA function in the cerebral cortical pathways and to prevent the exacerbation of mood, cognition, and negative symptoms following rapid release of DA from the receptor. Rapid release translates into low potency. Low-potency medications (i.e. those that require a high dosage to achieve a treatment effect such as clozapine and quetiapine) can be released faster from the D2 receptors compared with high-potency medications (i.e. those for which a low dosage achieves a treatment effect such as risperidone), and medium-potency medications (such as olanzapine), which have an intermediate disengagement speed (Si et al., 2011).

Partial activation of DA receptors reduces DA output in the midbrain limbic system, which leads to fewer positive symptoms, but is not enough to influence senses of pleasure and satisfaction. Since the DA output in the cerebral cortical pathways may be too low, partial DA activists actually increase DA release in this area, which leads to improved cognition, mood, and negative symptoms (Si et al., 2011). Partial DA activists include aripiprazole, amisulpride, and sulpiride (for amisulpride and sulpride, the clinical indicators of partial DA activation are more evident at low dosages) (Si et al., 2011).

There is a wide variation in the treatment effects of antipsychotics. At low dosages, many nondopaminergic antipsychotics have the same mechanism of action as antidepressants: increasing DA transmission in the prefrontal cortex. Lavergne and Jay (2010) hypothesized that depressive disorders are a result of ‘synaptic depression’ caused by decreased DA transmission and elevated D1 receptor functioning in the prefrontal cortex, changes that can be corrected by increasing DA transmission (Filip and Bader, 2009). Increased functioning of DA can improve synaptic plasticity and neuroregeneration, but there is a U-shaped dose–response relationship between DA activity and synaptic plasticity (Lavergne and Jay, 2010). The interaction between DA and GA is via the D1 receptor subtype and the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, so BDNF may play a regulatory role in this process (Lavergne and Jay, 2010).

5-hydroxytryptamine

Different atypical antipsychotic medications have very different binding affinity for different types of 5-HT receptors (De Sousa and Kurvey, 2012). These differences in binding capacity are often more apparent when combined with antidepressants (De Sousa and Kurvey, 2012).

The activation of the 5-HT1A receptor leads to the closure of the 5-HT neuron impulse, decreased electroactivities and release of 5-HT, decreased postsynaptic concentration of NE and 5-HT, and reduced inhibition of NE and DA (Si et al., 2011). Postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors inhibit the release of GA from neurons in the cortical pyramid and regulate the metabolism of hormones that influences mood, anxiety, and cognition. When 5-HT1A is activated by 5-HT, signals are delivered by the second messenger cyclic adenosine monophosphate and promote gene expression. This increase in gene expression can help the regulation of neurotransmitters and neurotrophic factors which, in turn, help the alleviation of depressive symptoms (Si et al., 2011). In support of this explanation for the role of 5-HT1A receptors, a study of 5-HT1A receptor gene-knockout mice reported increased anxiety-related behaviors, an anti-depression-like phenotype, and impaired cognition (Filip and Bader, 2009). Moreover, the effect of the partial 5-HT1A receptor activators (such as buspirone) is delayed, similar to antidepressants, which suggests that the treatment effect is related to upstream or downstream adaptation rather than to acute changes in these receptors (Si et al., 2011).

The isoreceptor function of the 5-HT2A receptor is through the expression at DA, GABA, GA, and Ach neurons on the dendrite of the cell. In vivo microdialysis found that activation of the 5-HT2A receptor may boost the release of GA and GABA and inhibit the release of DA and NE (Filip and Bader, 2009). Contrary to the 5-HT1A receptor, when 5-HT2A is activated, the delivery is blocked at the second messenger system cyclic adenosine monophosphate and, thus, inhibits gene expression. In mice, the destruction of the entire 5-HT2A receptor messenger system reduced the inhibition of conflict anxiety and did not influence behaviors related to fear and depression; selective recovery of the cortex 5-HT2A receptor signals restored the conflict anxiety behavior (Filip and Bader, 2009).

5-HT2C receptors are located in GABA, GA, and DA neurons. They function as cellular dendrite isoreceptors (Filip and Bader, 2009). In vivo neurochemical studies found that the activation of 5-HT2C receptors can inhibit the release of DA and NE in the cortex (Filip and Bader, 2009). A study found that 5-HT2C receptor-mutated mice did not show obvious anxiety induced by 5-HT2C receptor stimulants (Filip and Bader, 2009), which suggest that these receptors influence emotions and behavior.

The inhibition of 5-HT2C receptors is also related to extended slow-wave sleep and the increase of sleep efficiency − which are associated with the core symptoms of depression. Among individuals with depressive disorders, there is less slow-wave sleep, a shorter latency period of REM sleep, shorter sustained sleep time, a longer latency period for sleep initiation, longer awake time, more frequent REM sleep, and more θ and δ waves in the sleep EEG (Begić et al., 2009). SSRIs usually lead to increased 5-HT levels between synapses inducing both treatment effects and unintended side effects (Filip and Bader, 2009), including sleep disorders related to the stimulation of 5-HT2C receptors. Low dosages of atypical antipsychotics can inhibit 5-HT2C receptors and, thus, decrease the occurrence and severity of these anti-depressant-induced sleep problems, enhancing the treatment effects of SSRI antidepressants (Si et al., 2011). A single 5-mg dose of olanzapine can extend slow-wave sleep, total sleep time, and sleep efficiency, and reduce time awake (Gimenez et al., 2007); a single 1-mg dose risperidone can reduce REM sleep (Gimenez et al., 2007). The effect of extended slow-wave sleep of olanzapine and ziprasidone is related to 5-HT2C receptor inhibition (Gimenez et al., 2007). The binding ability of quetiapine to 5-HT2C receptors is low, so it does not influence slow-wave sleep (Gedge et al., 2010), but daily treatment with 155 mg of quetiapine for 2–4 days has been shown to decrease REM sleep, possibly due to its high binding ability with H1 receptors (Jensen et al., 2008).

Experimental data suggest that the 5-HT7 receptor is the key mediator for the antidepressant effect of aripiprazole (Abbas et al., 2009). The combination of SSRIs and 5-HT7 receptor antagonists can increase the treatment effects of SSRIs (Hedlund, 2009). Animal studies have also found that 5-HT6 receptor antagonists can enhance the effects of antidepressants (Wesolowska, 2010).

Norepinephrine

NE is located in many brain areas. It is the main monoamine neurotransmitter that regulates arousal and stress reactions. Reduced activities in the prefrontal cortex regulated by NE may be related to decline in cognitive functioning (e.g. attention) and motivation. Since noradrenergic descending fibers from the nucleus coeruleus also go to brain areas that regulate motor functioning (i.e. the striatum and cerebellum), NE may also be related to the regulation of physical fatigue. N-desalkylquetiapine, the metabolite of quetiapine, can block the NE transporter and promote the delivery of NE; the binding of quetiapine to the NE transporter is almost negligible (Sagud et al., 2011).

NE and NE neurons as well as the α2 receptor on the presynaptic membrane of the 5-HT neuron can block the release of NE and 5-HT. Antagonists of the α2 receptor can relieve this inhibition and increase the release of 5-HT and NE, producing an antidepressant effect. Additionally, the α1 receptor on the postsynaptic membrane of the NE and 5-HT neurons can enhance the release of 5-HT. Thus, when NE inhibition is blocked, the α1 receptor is activated, which leads to a magnified release of 5-HT (Wang and Si, 2013). Preclinical neurological data show that the antidepressant mechanism of risperidone is due to the inhibition of the α2 receptor (Dhir and Kulkarni, 2008); some researchers believe the antidepressant effect of quetiapine is also moderated by the inhibition of the α2 receptor.

SSRIs increase the transmission of 5-HT in the cerebrum and nucleus ceruleus, and thus, decrease the discharge of NE neurons. Atypical antipsychotics increase the discharge of NE neurons via the inhibition of 5-HT2A, α2, or NE transporters. This may be the reason that SGA are effective among depressed patients who get limited benefit from SSRI treatment (Blier and Szabo, 2005).

Glutamate

GA is the main neurotransmitter stimulant in the central nervous system. The physiological functions of GA are usually moderated via nonionic mechanisms such as NMDA, Α-amino-hydroxy methyl oxazole propionic acid, kainic acid receptor, and metabolic GA receptor (Garakani et al., 2013). Several reports have suggested the key role of GA in the neurobiology and treatment of depressive disorders. Abnormal GA functioning has been found in patients with depressive disorders and some GA-related medications have shown some antidepressant effects (Tokita et al., 2012). Several metabolic GA receptors [e.g. 9-aminomethyl-9,10-dihydroanthracene and α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPA)] and the GA transporter have been associated with the development and treatment of depressive disorders (Tokita et al., 2012).

Studies have found that quetiapine can decrease mRNA expression of the NR-1 and NR-2C subtypes of the NMDA receptor in the septal nuclei (Porcelli et al., 2011). Quetiapine can also increase the expression of the G luR-B and G luR-C subtypes of the AMPA receptor in the hippocampus (Porcelli et al., 2011). Some researchers hypothesize that quetiapine can normalize GA neurotransmission and decrease the risk of overstimulation by changing the activities of the GA receptors (Blier and Szabo, 2005).

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

Preclinical and clinical studies found that inhibition of the GABA system is related to the pathophysiology of depression. The regulation of extracellular concentrations of NE and DA in the prefrontal cortex by the administration of quetiapine is regulated by NMDA that is moderated by AMPA and GABA (Porcelli et al., 2011). Joint use of fluvoxamine and haloperidol led to changes in GABA receptors and signal-delivery systems in some brain regions in rats; this change was not observed when fluvoxamine or haloperidol were used alone (Silver et al., 2011). Similar observations have been reported among patients with schizophrenia; some studies suggest that combined treatment may lead to a better improvement of negative symptoms (Silver et al., 2011). There has been no study on this topic among patients with depressive disorders.

Hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis

Mood disorders are related to changes in the stress-response system. Convincing evidence has been found for increased cortisol levels among patients with depressive disorders (Stetler and Miller, 2011). Unlike haloperidol, low-dose quetiapine and olanzapine can decrease cortisol levels among healthy volunteers (Cohrs et al., 2006). However, there has been no study about the changes in cortisol levels after the use of antipsychotics among patients with depressive disorders (Sagud et al., 2011), so it is unclear whether or not the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis plays a role in the antidepressant effect of antipsychotic medications (Sagud et al., 2011).

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor

Preclinical and clinical studies have found that the increase of neurotrophic factors, especially BDNF, is a common characteristic in the mechanisms of action of antidepressant medications. A meta-analysis summarizing 11 studies found decreased BDNF levels in untreated depression and a return of BDNF levels to the normal after antidepressant treatment (Sen et al., 2008). These findings have led some researchers to propose using BDNF concentration as a biomarker for disease severity and treatment effects (Sen et al., 2008). After the use of SGA such as olanzapine, plasma BDNF levels increase (González-Pinto et al., 2010). Moreover, one relatively small study found that the increase in BDNF levels of depressed patients treated with a variety of antipsychotics and antidepressants was greater in patients considered responsive to the combined treatment (Yoshimura et al., 2010). This suggestive study needs to be repeated with a larger sample that would allow differentiation of the results for different combinations of medications.

Adverse reactions when using antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders

Due attention should be paid to the potential side effects of antipsychotic medications when considering adjunctive treatment in patients with depressive disorders. These side effects include the metabolic syndrome (e.g. poor regulation of the metabolism of sugar and fats), extrapyramidal symptom (EPS), high prolactin, sedation, abnormal liver function, and cardiac irregularities (Sagud et al., 2011). The doses of antipsychotic medications used as adjunctive treatment in depression are usually lower than when used as the primary treatment in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, so the prevalence and severity of these side effects is usually lower (Corponi et al., 2019; Chen et al., 2011), but clinicians must be vigilant about these adverse reactions, particularly in elderly patients.

In the mid-1980s, two studies observed a high prevalence of tardive dyskinesia after long-term use of typical antipsychotics in individuals with mood disorders (Baldessarini, 1988; Keck et al., 2000). Subsequent studies (Keck et al., 2000; Vacheron-Trystram et al., 2004) reported that the prevalence of tardive dyskinesia in patients with mood disorders who were treated with antipsychotic medication ranged from 9 to 64%. Among these studies, only one study included patients with schizophrenia (Keck et al., 2000); this study reported that the occurrence of tardive dyskinesia was higher among mood-disorder patients (42%) than in patients with schizophrenia (25%).

In general, the occurrence of EPS is lower for atypical antipsychotics compared with typical antipsychotics (except for aripiprazole). With the exceptions of risperidone and paliperidone, the influence of atypical antipsychotics on the level of prolactin is also smaller than that of typical antipsychotics.

For patients with TRD who require long-term medication, the advantage of adjunctive treatment with antipsychotics can be considerable, but chronic use of these medications, even at relatively low doses, can lead to increases in blood lipids, triglycerides, and glucose, resulting in weight gain and an increased risk of type II diabetes. These risks are greatest with clozapine and olanzapine; moderate with paliperidone, risperidone, and quetiapine; and small with aripiprazole and ziprasidone. Except for clozapine, the antidepressant treatment effects of different atypical antipsychotics are similar, so the side-effect profile should be the deciding factor in the choice of antipsychotic medication (Hasnain et al., 2012). Clinicians need to consider the patient’s age, weight, BMI, medical history, and family history of diabetes and cardiovascular diseases when weighing the potential risks of different antipsychotics (Zuddas et al., 2011). When using atypical antipsychotics as adjunctive treatment for depressed patients, clinicians should follow the guidance about monitoring and screening of the American Diabetes Association (Morrato et al., 2009) and should counsel patients about diet, exercise, and a healthy lifestyle. When lifestyle interventions fail to prevent weight gain in young patients using low-dose atypical antipsychotics, metformin can be considered if other SGA are not suitable (Hasnain et al., 2012).

In older patients, the side effects of SGA include increased mortality [number needed to harm (NNH)=87], stroke (risperidone NNH=53), EPS (olanzapine NNH=10, risperidone NNH=20), and urinary-system symptoms (NNH=16–36) (Maher and Theodore, 2012). Clinicians need to carefully weigh the potential benefits and potential risks of long-term adjunctive treatment of elderly depressed patients with antipsychotic medications.


  Conclusion Top


There is considerable evidence on the efficacy of some SGAs as an adjunction to antidepressants in MDD. Brexpiprazole, aripiprazole, quetiapine XR, and olanzapine plus fluoxetine are approved by FDA. Quetiapine XR was proven effective also as a monotherapy. While their mechanism is not completely understood, antagonism of serotonergic and noradrenergic receptors, blockade of monoamine transporters, effects on sleep, decrease in cortisol levels, and increase in neurotrophic growth factors seem to be involved. Antipsychotics should be given at the lowest effective dose in patients to MDD, and patients need close monitoring for additional adverse events.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.







[37]



 
  References Top

1.
Abbas AI, Hedlund PB, Huang XP, Tran TB, Meltzer HY, Roth BL (2009). Amisulpride is a potent 5-HT7 antagonist: relevance for antidepressant actions in vivo. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 205 (1):119–128.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Baldessarini RJ (1988). A summary of current knowledge of tardive dyskinesia. Encephale 14:263–268.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Begić D, Mahnik-Milos M, Grubisin J (2009). EEG characteristics in depression, ‘negative’ and ‘positive’ schizophrena. Psychiatr Danub 21:579–584.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Blier P, Szabo ST (2005). Potential mechanisms of action of atypical antipsychotic medications in treatment-resistant depression and anxiety. J Clin Psychiatry 66 (Suppl 8):30–40.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Casey DE (1988). Affective disorders and tardive dyskinesia. Encephale 14:221–226.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Chen J, Gao K, Kemp DE (2011). Second-generation antipsychotics in major depressive disorder: update and clinical perspective. Curr Opin Psychiatry 24:10–17.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Cohrs S, Roher C, Jordan W, Meier A, Huether G, Wuttke W et al. (2006). The atypical antipsychotics olanzapine and quetiapine, but not haloperidol, reduce ACTH and cortisol secretion in healthy subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 185:11–18.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Corponi F, Fabbri C, Bitter I, Montgomery S, Vieta E, Kasper S, Pallanti S, Serretti A (2019). Novel antipsychotics specificity profile: a clinically oriented review of lurasidone, brexpiprazole, cariprazine and lumateperone. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 29:971–985  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
De Sousa A, Kurvey A (2012). An evidence based clinical review on the role of atypical antipsychotics in depression. J Ment Health Human Behav 1:38–45.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Dhir A, Kulkarni SK (2008). Risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic enhances the antidepressant-like effect of venlafaxine or fluoxetine: possible involvement of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors. Neurosci Lett 445:83–88.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Filip M, Bader M (2009). Overview on 5-HT receptors and their role in physiology and pathology of the central nervous system. Pharmacol Rep 61:761–777.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Garakani A, Martinez JM, Yehuda R, Gorman JM (2013). Cerebrospinal fluid levels of glutamate and corticotropin releasing hormone in major depression before and after treatment. J Affect Disord 146:262–265.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gedge L, Lazowski L, Murray D, Jokic R, Milev R (2010). Effects of quetiapine on sleep architecture in patients with unipolar or bipolar depression. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 6:501–508.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gimenez S, Clos S, Romero S, Grasa E, Morte A, Barbanoj MJ (2007). Effects of olanzapine, risperidone and haloperidol on sleep after a single oral morning dose in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 190:507–516.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
González-Pinto A, Mosquera F, Palomino A, Alberich S, Gutiérrez A, Haidar K et al. (2010). Increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in first episode psychotic patients after treatment with atypical antipsychotics. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 25:241–245.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Han C, Wang SM, Kato M, Lee SJ, Patkar AA, Masand PS et al. (2013). Second-generation antipsychotics in the treatment of major depressive disorder: current evidence. Expert Rev Neurother 13:851–870.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Hasnain M, Vieweg WV, Hollett B (2012). Weight gain and glucose dysregulation with second-generation antipsychotics and antidepressants: a review for primary care physicians. Postgrad Med 124:154–167.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Hedlund PB (2009). The 5-HT7 receptor and disorders of the nervous system: an overview. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 206:345–354.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Jensen NH, Rodriguiz RM, Caron MG, Wetsel WC, Rothman RB, Roth BL (2008). N-desalkylquetiapine, a potent norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and partial 5-HT1A agonist, as a putative mediator of quetiapine’s antidepressant activity. Neuropsychopharmacology 33:2303–2312.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Keck PEJr, McElroy SL, Strakowski SM, Soutullo CA (2000). Antipsychotics in the treatment of mood disorders and risk of tardive dyskinesia. J Clin Psychiatry 61(suppl 4): 33–38.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Komossa K, Depping AM, Gaudchau A, Kissling W, Leucht S (2010). Second-generation antipsychotics for major depressive disorder and dysthymia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:D8121.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lavergne F, Jay TM (2010). A new strategy for antidepressant prescription. Front Neurosci 4:192.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Maher AR, Theodore G (2012). Summary of the comparative effectiveness review on off-label use of atypical antipsychotics. J Manag Care Pharm 18(5 Suppl B):S1–S20.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Morrato EH, Newcomer JW, Kamat S, Harnett J, Cuffel B (2009). Metabolic screening after the American Diabetes Association’s Consensus Statement on Antipsychotic Drugs and Diabetes. Diabetes Care 32:1037–1042.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Ostroff RB, Nelson JC (1999). Risperidone augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in major depression. J Clin Psychiatry 60:256–259.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Porcelli S, Drago A, Fabbri C, Serretti A (2011). Mechanisms of antidepressant action: an integrated dopaminergic perspective. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 35:1532–1543.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Sagud M, Mihaljevic-Peles A, Begic D, Vuksan-Cusa B, Kramaric M, Zivkovic M et al. (2011). Antipsychotics as antidepressants: what is the mechanism? Psychiatr Danub 23:302–307.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Sen S, Duman R, Sanacora G (2008). Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor, depression, and antidepressant medications: meta-analyses and implications. Biol Psychiatry 64:527–532.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Silver H, Susser E, Danovich L, Bilker W, Youdim M, Goldin V et al. (2011). SSRI augmentation of antipsychotic alters expression of GABAA receptor and related genes in PMC of schizophrenia patients. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 14:573–584.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Stetler C, Miller GE (2011). Depression and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activation: a quantitative summary of four decades of research. Psychosom Med 73:114–126.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Tokita K, Yamaji T, Hashimoto K (2012). Roles of glutamate signaling in preclinical and/or mechanistic models of depression. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 100:688–704.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Vacheron-Trystram MN, Braitman A, Cheref S, Auffray L (2004). Antipsychotics in bipolar disorders. Encephale 30:417–424.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Wang P, Si T (2013). Use of antipsychotics in the treatment of depressive disorders. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry 25:134.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Wang SM, Han C, Lee SJ, Jun TY, Patkar AA, Masand PS, Pae CU (2016). Second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an update. Chonnam Med J 52:159–172.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Wesolowska A (2010). Potential role of the 5-HT6 receptor in depression and anxiety: an overview of preclinical data. Pharmacol Rep 62:564–577.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Yoshimura R, Ikenouchi-Sugita A, Hori H, Umene-Nakano W, Katsuki A, Hayashi K et al. (2010). Adding a low dose atypical antipsychotic drug to an antidepressant induced a rapid increase of plasma brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 34:308–312.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Zuddas A, Zanni R, Usala T (2011). Second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for non-psychotic disorders in children and adolescents: a review of the randomized controlled studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 21:600–620.  Back to cited text no. 37
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed262    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded33    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]