Egyptian Journal of Psychiatry

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2020  |  Volume : 41  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 171--176

Auditory brainstem responses in children with autistic spectrum disorder


Heba E.A El Wafa1, Soha A.E.L Ghobashy1, Hesham Kozou2, Amira K Zakaria1,  
1 Department of Psychiatry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
2 Department of Audiology, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt

Correspondence Address:
Heba E.A El Wafa
Department of Psychiatry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Zip Code 002
Egypt

Abstract

Background The assessment and management of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is complex and therefore requires continuous efforts for developing evidence-based guidelines for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ASD. This research aims to study auditory brainstem response (ABR) in autistic children as a potential biomarker that could detect autism early during infancy as well as to study its relation to repetitive behavior. Patients and methods It included 60 children diagnosed with ASD according to DSM-5 among those attending the Child and Adolescent Outpatient Clinic at Elhadara University Hospital and Mamoura Psychiatric Hospital. Those with hearing or visual impairment, epileptic syndromes, psychotic illness, or other affective disorder were excluded from the study. In all, 53 (88.3%) boys and seven (11.7%) girls participated in this study. Their mean±SD age was 6.41±1.99 years. Childhood Autism Rating Scale, 2nd ed., Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised, and audiological studies were performed with emphasis on ABR by a consultant of audiology. Results Statistical analysis was done on the results and the study showed that absolute latency of waves III and V on the right ear and those of waves I and III on the left ear and interpeak latencies I–III and I–V of both the right and left ears were significantly away from norms in the ASD group and latency of wave I from the left side shows a significant positive correlation with total Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised score. This denotes that a longer duration of wave I corresponds to severity of repetitive and restricted behaviors. Conclusion During initial assessment of a suspected ASD case, click ABR at an intensity of 80 dB (not the usual one at an intensity of 30 dB for screening of hearing impairment) to be requested and examination of the full parameters for assessment of auditory processing and not only for excluding a hearing problem.



How to cite this article:
El Wafa HE, Ghobashy SA, Kozou H, Zakaria AK. Auditory brainstem responses in children with autistic spectrum disorder.Egypt J Psychiatr 2020;41:171-176


How to cite this URL:
El Wafa HE, Ghobashy SA, Kozou H, Zakaria AK. Auditory brainstem responses in children with autistic spectrum disorder. Egypt J Psychiatr [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 20 ];41:171-176
Available from: http://new.ejpsy.eg.net/text.asp?2020/41/3/171/297110


Full Text



 Background



Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by persistent deficits in the ability to initiate and to sustain reciprocal social interaction and social communication, and by a range of restricted, repetitive, and inflexible patterns of behavior and interests (World Health Organization, 2018). Repetitive and restricted behaviors represent a common problem for various psychiatric syndromes, especially in ASD, where they constitute the second dimension of diagnostic criteria (Cuccaro et al., 2003; American Psychiatric Association, 2013; Matuschek et al., 2016). Repetitive and restricted behaviors include a wide range of heterogeneous behavioral manifestations (Szatmari et al., 2006; Bourreau et al., 2009). An accurate and standardized description of these behaviors advances the understanding of this complex and heterogeneous clinical dimension of ASD (Bodfish et al., 2000; Carcani-Rathwell et al., 2006).

Remarkably, in autism, the basal ganglia and the cerebellum are both impacted in their motor and nonmotor domains and are recently thought to be connected via the pons through a short synaptic pathway (Subramanian et al., 2017; Traut et al., 2018; Fernández et al., 2019).

On a behavioral level, children with autism were faster than typically developing children in their ability to detect novel auditory stimuli. Gomot et al. (2011) suggested that although there were no differences in terms of initial registration of novel auditory stimuli (at the level of primary auditory cortex), these stimuli were differently processed by higher prefrontal regions. Evidence of hyperactivity to auditory stimuli by fMRI were also supported by electrophysiological findings (Ornitz et al., 1977; Gomot et al., 2011).

The auditory brainstem response (ABR) is an auditory-evoked potential recorded as a waveform that is characterized by five waves, with the first wave (wave I) originating at the auditory nerve and the fifth wave (wave V) originating at the upper brainstem. Recent publications show that wave V latency is prolonged in infants who were later diagnosed with ASD. Prolongation of the absolute latency of wave V in ASD had a significant negative correlation with age. Some studies below the age of 18 years showed a significantly prolonged wave V in ASD. Prolonged ABR was consistent in infants and children with ASD, suggesting it can serve as an ASD biomarker at infancy (Cohen et al., 2013; Miron et al., 2016).

Studies provide evidence for a neurodevelopmental brainstem abnormality that is already apparent in young children with suspected ASD. ABR findings support the assertion that an auditory processing deficit may be at the core of this disorder (Roth et al., 2012).

 Aim



To assess ABR as a diagnostic tool in infants and as a trait marker of ASD.To assess the relation between ABR and repetitive behavior, which is one of the core features of autism.

 Patients and methods



A cross-sectional survey design was used on a selected sample of 60 autistic children. A consent to participate in the study was obtained from parents of all children as well as approval of the current research from ethics committee of Alexandria University.

All cases were subjected to the following:History taking.Thorough clinical examination with emphasis on neurological examination.Childhood Autism Rating Scale, 2nd ed.: the standardized Arabic edition for an established assessment for ASD among Arabic-speaking children (Akoury-Diraniet al., 2013).The Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised (Lam and Aman, 2007).Audiological examination and testing.

Every child was scheduled an appointment at the Alexandria University Audiology Unit to be examined by an audiology specialist and subjected to the following.Basic audiological evaluation: basic audiological evaluation was done to ensure normal peripheral hearing and intact acoustic reflexes.Otoscopy for inspection of the external auditory canal and tympanic membrane.226 Hz tympanometry and ipsilateral acoustic reflexes thresholds at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz using the tympanometer model ‘Clarinet, Inventis, Padova − Italy.’Pure-tone audiometry (PTA) was performed in a double-walled soundproof room using an audiometer (AD229E Audiometer; Interacoustics, Assens, Denmark). Air-conduction thresholds were measured using TDH39 headphones calibrated according to ISO 389. Pure-tone thresholds were 20 dBHL or less between 0.25 and 8 kHz.ABR:ABR audiometry refers to an evoked potential generated by a brief click or tone pip transmitted from an acoustic transducer in the form of an insert earphone or headphone. The elicited waveform response is measured by surface electrodes typically placed at the vertex of the scalp and ear lobes. The amplitude (microvoltage) of the signal is averaged and charted against time (millisecond), much like an electroencephalography. The waveform peaks are labeled I–VII. These waveforms normally occur within a 10-ms time period after a click stimulus presented at high intensities [70–90 dB normal hearing level (nHL)] (Burkardet al., 2007; Hammond and Katta-Charles, 2016).

In this study, ABR was performed using Interacoustics Eclipse EP 25 (InteracousticsAssens, Denmark) in a darkened quiet room. Two channel recordings were obtained. Inverting or negative electrodes on each mastoid (reference), the noninverting or positive electrode in the Cz or FPz position on the high forehead, and the ground connection was placed on the low forehead. The electrode sites were prepared to assure that the top layer of the skin (epidermis) is cleaned and oil is removed. This ensures low skin impedance for the measurement. For this purpose, skin preparation paste was used. Disposable electroencephalography electrodes were used.

After applying the electrodes, impedance was measured. Interelectrode impedance did not exceed 3000 ohms and the differences between electrode pairs were kept at below 2000 ohms.

In children who were not cooperative in PTA or PTA was not applicable, their thresholds were obtained by ABR. Thresholds were searched for at a starting level of 70 dB; if present descend in 20 dB steps, if absent ascend in 10 dB steps.

Recordings were replicated to ensure response reliability, and only reproducible waveforms were accepted at each intensity level till reaching the threshold. The stimulus was 100 μs, rarefaction, broadband click, presented at a rate of 21.1/s, with total sweeps 1000, with a time window of 20 ms.

Stimuli were delivered through IP30 insert phones. Recordings were filtered online with a 100–3000 Hz band-pass filter. The input rejection level was set to 40 µV. Only children with normal hearing thresholds were included in the study.

Then other ABR waves are obtained at 80 dB nHL for all children with the following parameters: 80 dB nHL, 100 μs, rarefaction, broadband click, presented at a rate of 21.1/s, with total sweeps of 1000, with a time window of 20 ms.

Data obtained from ABR were focusing on absolute latencies and amplitudes of waves I, III, V on both sides; interpeak latencies (IPLs) I–III, III–V, and I–V; and interaural latencies between right and left. Results were compared with normal values obtained from the audiology clinic database, from typically developing children of the same age group.

 Results



Statistical analysis was done on the results and the study showed that absolute latency of waves III and V on the right ear and those of waves I and III on the left ear and interpeak latencies I–III and I–V of both the right and left ears were significantly away from norms in the ASD group and latency of wave I from the left side shows a significant positive correlation with total Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised score. This denotes that a longer duration of wave I corresponds to severity of repetitive and restricted behaviors.

[Table 1],[Table 2],[Table 3],[Table 4] and [Figure 1].{Table 1}{Table 2}{Table 3}{Table 4}{Figure 1}

 Discussion



Regarding ABR, we measured the absolute latencies of waves I, III, and V, the interwave intervals of I–V, I–III, and III–V. Data analysis was performed at stimulus intensity levels of 80 dB SPL.

In this study, comparing the autistic group with the norms used at the Audiology Clinic in the Alexandria Main University Hospital revealed that absolute latency of waves III and V on the right ear and those of waves I and III on the left ear and IPLs I–III and I–V of both the right and left ears were significantly away from norms in the ASD group. These finding indicate that children with autism have dysfunction or immaturity of the central auditory nervous system.

On the other hand, wave I on the left side had a significant positive correlation with Repetitive Behavior Scale–Revised score. This signifies that this part of the central nervous system could be related to those specific features of ASD, yet this needs to be replicated in further studies.

Magliaro et al. (2010) evaluated auditory-evoked potentials in a group of autistic children, whose quantitative data analysis showed that statistically significant differences between the ASD group and the control group were found only for the ABR regarding the latencies of waves III and V and interpeaks I–III and I–V. Kwon et al. (2007) and Azouz et al. (2014) found that the latency of wave V and waves I–V IPLs were significantly prolonged in the ASD group.

In agreement with our findings, Roth et al. (2012) found that all absolute latencies and IPLs were significantly prolonged in the group with ASDs compared with clinical norms, excluding IPL III–V (Miron et al., 2016). This coinciding results despite the variability in ABR findings in research could be explained by the fact that the same age group has been examined (Miron et al., 2018).

Taking into consideration that ABR informs us about the processing of acoustic stimuli in the brainstem, these findings may give some clinical evidence of brainstem abnormalities, which could be partly responsible for abnormal development in autistic children.

 Conclusion



Absolute latency of waves III and V on the right ear and those of waves I and III on the left ear and IPLs I–III and I–V of both the right and left ears could be used in infants suspected to be autistic and it is highly correlated to repetitive behaviors.

Acknowledgements

All authors have contributed in writing this paper and Amira K. Zakaria and Heba E.A. El Wafa were responsible for examining cases and for performing scales; Hesham Kozou was responsible for performing all auditory studies.[24]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Akoury-Dirani L, Alameddine M, Salamoun M (2013). Validation of the Lebanese childhood autism rating scale-second edition-standard version. Res Autism Spectr Disord 7:1097–1103.
2American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM). 5th ed. United State of America, Washington: APA.
3Azouz H, Kozou H, Khalil M, Mustafa RM, Sakr M (2014). The correlation between central auditory processing in autistic children and their language processing abilities. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 78:2297–2300.
4Bodfish J, Symons F, Parker D, Lewis M (2000). Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. J Autism Dev Disord 30:237–243.
5Bourreau Y, Roux S, Gomot M, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Barthélémy C (2009). Validation of the repetitive and restricted behaviour scale in autism spectrum disorders. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 18:675–682.
6Burkard RF, Eggermont JJ, Don M (2007). Auditory evoked potentials: basic principles and clinical application. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
7Carcani-Rathwell I, Rabe-Hasketh S, Santosh P (2006). Repetitive and stereotyped behaviours in pervasive developmental disorders. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:573–581.
8Cohen I, Gardner J, Karmel B, Phan H, Kittler P, Gomez T et al. (2013). Neonatal brainstem function and 4-month arousal-modulated attention are jointly associated with autism. Autism Res 6:11–22.
9Cuccaro M, Shao Y, Grubber J, Slifer M, Wolpert C, Donnelly LS et al. (2003). Factor analysis of restricted and repetitive behaviors in autism using the autism diagnostic interview-R. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 34:3–17.
10Fernández M, Sierra-Arregui T, Peñagarikano O (2019). The cerebellum and autism: more than motor control. In: Palermo S, Morese R (eds). Behavioral neuroscience. xx: Intech Open; 1–17.
11Gomot M, Blanc R, Clery H, Roux S, Barthelemy C, Bruneau N (2011). Candidate electrophysiological endophenotypes of hyper-reactivity to change in autism. J Autism Dev Disord 41:705–714.
12Hammond F, Katta-Charles S (2016). Brainstem auditory evoked responses. In: Kreutzer J, DeLuca J, Caplan B (eds). Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 1–2.
13Kwon S, Kim J, Choe BH, Ko C, Park S (2007). Electrophysiologic assessment of central auditory processing by auditory brainstem responses in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Korean Med Sci 22:656–659.
14Lam KS, Aman MG (2007). The repetitive behavior scale-revised: independent validation in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord 37:855–866.
15Magliaro F, Scheuer C, Assumpção F, Matas C (2010). Study of auditory evoked potentials in autism. Pro Fono 22:31–36.
16Matuschek T, Jaeger S, Stadelmann S, Dölling K, Grunewald M, Weis S et al. (2016). Implementing the K-SADS-PL as a standard diagnostic tool: effects on clinical diagnoses. Psychiatry Res 236:119–124.
17Miron O, Ari-Even Roth D, Gabis LV, Henkin Y, Shefer S, Dinstein I et al. (2016). Prolonged auditory brainstem responses in infants with autism. Autism Res 9:689–695.
18Miron O, Beam AL, Kohane IS (2018). Auditory brainstem response in infants and children with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis of wave V. Autism Res 11:355–363.
19Ornitz E, Guthrie D, Farley A (1977). Early development of autistic children. J Autism Child Schizophr 7:207–229.
20Roth DA, Muchnik C, Shabtai E, Hildesheimer M, Henkin Y (2012). Evidence for atypical auditory brainstem responses in young children with suspected autism spectrum disorders. Dev Med Child Neurol 54:23–29.
21Subramanian K, Brandenburg C, Orsati F, Soghomonian JJ, Hussman JP, Blatt GJ (2017). Basal ganglia and autism − a translational perspective. Autism Res 10:1751–1775.
22Szatmari P, Georgiades S, Bryson S, Zwaigenbaum L, Roberts W, Mahoney W et al. (2006). Investigating the structure of the restricted, repetitive behaviours and interests domain of autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 47:582–590.
23Traut N, Beggiato A, Bourgeron T, Delorme R, Rondi-Reig L, Paradis AL et al. (2018). Cerebellar volume in autism: literature meta-analysis and analysis of the autism brain imaging data exchange cohort. Biol Psychiatry 83:579–588.
24World Health Organization (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics. Geneva: WHO.